Human gene is Controversial for science

Modifications of human genes are controversial. Shoukhrat Mitalipov does not hear
A research group in Oregon wants to use the CRISPR to end the hereditary disease – even if the fear of spreading to children by brand.

The sperm sperm moves gently through the sepia laptop screen. Normally, the embryo tells me more quickly, but these children are the sticky fluid that can overcome them. It makes it easier to take.

The needle is thin, hollow into the scene from the screen to the right and towards the toy. The device sucks, the first queue. The smaller circle remains visible in the spermatozoon term.Quick screen on the new screen. Spermatozoa disappears and is replaced by larger eggs and fluctuations. Human egg

Another device came on the screen, pushing one of the eggs to swim like a good ball. After another try, a device like a finger to catch the egg, using a soft suction to hold it.

The producer of the show is Nuria Marti-Gutierrez’s researcher, who sits on a microscope near the screen, never taking the eyes of his future as a hand maneuver through half-key buttons and dials. The process is not visible to the naked eye. Each of these acts applies to a microscopic stage.

Spinning the screen, empty sperm causes quick pitbits to take an additional solution before it looks back, ready and ready.

In the egg, the eggs will be injected not only with the sperm but with the CRISPR-Cas9 dose, a DNA editing system that allows scientists to cut down on the gene segment and replace it with others. If all else is good, the CRISPR system will create a single human embryo to repair the mutation that causes the disease in DNA.

This laboratory, at Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) in Portland, is the only group in the United States to publish research on human embryos. Scientists are studying human genetic modification with the hope of treating specific hereditary diseases.

Since the claim in 2017 that succeeded in patogenetic mutation embryos, they faced the brutal reaction of scientists and opposition to the human genome. Now, after Chinese researchers announced the birth of gene-editedtwin girls by the end of 2018, they will have more resistance to extermination before bringing the technology to the clinic.

Twin birth

Perhaps no one is surprised to hear that genetically modified children are born in China rather than the Central OHSU group for embryonic cells and gene therapy, led by Shoukhrat Mitalipov. “I feel that all legitimate groups

Announcement by Chinese researchers, He Jiankui last November came at the Editing Human Genome International Summit in Hong Kong. He has to talk about his work shortly after his partner Mitalipov Paula Amato, a professor of maternity and gynecology and a doctor at the OHSU clinic of fertility.

“I was rather surprised to hear that someone dared to transfer this embryo and make a pregnancy, because of the uncertain situation,” Amato said. Mitalipov thinks that genetic editing technology will not be ready for clinical trials – such as tests of real pregnancy – for more than 5 to 10 years.

Beyond the scientific challenge, legal and ethical considerations usually establish this research rapidly. In the year 2017, the National Academy of Sciences and Sciences declared ethnoi and scientists to determine whether, and how to allow changes in the human germ line – DNA changes that will continue in the coming generations. The criterion of the report is an international guideline for research on the human genome.

Scientists are best 

But his work can not be determined, which produces huge replicas and ethics throughout the world. For example, the National Academy report determines that DNA modification should prevent hereditary disease. However, she started with a healthy gene

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *